Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110393›Full record

ReviewFood science & nutrition2026

Vinegar Consumption and Health: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Forough Shahmohammadi, Reza Amiri Khosroshahi, Hoda Derakhshanian, Hamed Mohammadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Forough ShahmohammadiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1833-2334
Reza Amiri KhosroshahiStudent Research Committee Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran.
Hoda DerakhshanianDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Hamed MohammadiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2046-7356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vinegar is a natural dietary product that has been proposed to exert beneficial effects on cardiometabolic health, including glycemic regulation, lipid metabolism, blood pressure control, and weight management. Although several meta-analyses have reported favorable outcomes associated with vinegar consumption, the overall strength and quality of the available evidence have not been comprehensively evaluated. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for relevant studies published up to January 2025. Effect sizes from eligible meta-analyses were re-estimated using a random-effects model. Ten meta-analyses, comprising a total of 38 primary studies, were included. Pooled results indicated that vinegar consumption was associated with improvements in fasting blood glucose (FBG) (-9.40 mg/dL), postprandial glucose (PPG) (-14.59 mg/dL), postprandial insulin (PPI) (-1.29 mu/L), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (-0.70%), total cholesterol (TC) (-9.39 mg/dL), body weight (-1.06 kg), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-2.94 mmHg). In contrast, no significant effects were observed for fasting plasma insulin (FPI), insulin resistance assessed by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides (TG), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), or diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Vinegar intake was associated with statistically significant improvements in FBG (moderate certainty), PPG (moderate certainty), HbA1c (moderate certainty), TC (very low certainty), body weight (high certainty), and SBP (high certainty). No significant effects were observed for other outcomes. The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to high across outcomes.

Indexed as

anthropometric indicatorsblood pressureglycemic controllipid profilemeta‐analysisvinegar

Identifiers

PMID42110393
PMCPMC13149749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.