ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Volumetric Assessment of a Soft-Tissue Tumor Using Smartphone Light Detection and Ranging and Neural Radiance Fields: A Single Case.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate volumetric assessment of soft-tissue tumors is essential for surgical planning and outcome monitoring. Although computed tomography (CT) is the standard, it involves radiation exposure and infrastructural dependency. Smartphone-based light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors with neural radiance fields (NeRFs) offer a portable, noninvasive alternative, yet clinical applications remain underexplored. We report the case of a 75-year-old man with a long-standing posterior cervical lipoma. Pre- and postoperative 3-dimensional data were acquired using conventional CT and a smartphone-based LiDAR scanning application with NeRF rendering. Tumor volume was estimated by calculating the difference in the surface volume of the head and neck between the 2 time points. Accuracy, feasibility, and potential sources of error were evaluated. The tumor volume was 156 mL via CT and 145 mL via smartphone 3-dimensional scan, with a minimal error margin of 7.0%. The actual specimen weighed 105 g, showing strong concordance. A slight overestimation occurred due to the inclusion of hair-bearing regions; however, differential volume calculation remained robust. The scan required less than 1 minute and was performed under standard clinical conditions without advanced equipment. This preliminary report demonstrates that smartphone-based LiDAR and NeRF technology enables simple, fast, and noninvasive volumetric assessment of soft-tissue masses with clinically promising accuracy. As these technologies evolve, they hold strong potential for broader application in surgical planning, outpatient follow-up, and remote care, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study provides early evidence for integration into future clinical workflows.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.