ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Integrative psychological interventions for stress regulation in sport: a mini-review.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and wearables in sport: performance, injury risk, and wellbeing.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Managing stress in sports: the Pro•Stress program.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychological stress plays a critical role in shaping performance and well-being in competitive sport. This mini-review examines three major categories of psychological interventions for stress regulation in athletes: cognitive-behavioral approaches, mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions, and psychophysiological and technology-assisted strategies. While existing literature generally supports the effectiveness of these approaches in improving emotional regulation, attentional control, and stress management, the evidence remains heterogeneous and often context-dependent. Importantly, current findings suggest that no single intervention can be considered universally optimal, as effectiveness appears to vary according to athlete characteristics and sport-specific demands. This review provides a critical and comparative synthesis of the literature, highlighting differential roles of intervention approaches across performance contexts. Cognitive-behavioral strategies appear most effective for structured pre-competition preparation, mindfulness-based approaches for in-performance regulation, and psychophysiological and technology-assisted strategies for monitoring and recovery processes. In addition, the increasing integration of technology in sport presents both opportunities and challenges. While technology-assisted tools may enhance self-awareness and feedback, excessive reliance on external monitoring may limit the development of autonomous self-regulation skills, particularly among younger athletes. Overall, stress regulation is best conceptualized as a trainable, context-sensitive skill that requires individualized and integrative intervention approaches. Future research should focus on comparative and longitudinal designs to better understand the interaction between intervention type, athlete profile, and performance context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.