ArticleIEEE International Conference on Development and Learning. IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning2025
Contingent behavior during caregiver-child interaction improves the quality of word learning opportunities.
Article in IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning. IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examined how the contingency of caregiver-child behavior influences child attention to named objects ("targets") during free-flowing toy play. Using gaze data collected from head-mounted eye tracking, we operationally categorized caregiver naming instances into three types based on the contingency between child attention and caregiver speech: (1) child-led contingency instances, where children were attending to the target prior to the onset of caregiver naming, (2) caregiver-led contingency instances, where children were not attending to the target at the onset of caregiver naming but switched their attention to the target during the utterance, and (3) non-contingent instances, where children did not attend to the target object at all during caregiver naming. We found that target attention for contingent instances was higher than for non-contingent instances. Further, target attention was higher for child-led instances than for caregiver-led instances. In child-led instances, caregivers tended to name the object that was in children's hands, and in caregiver-led instances, children tended to orient their attention to the object in their caregivers' hands. These results show that contingency of caregiver-child behavior has crucial implications for the quality of word learning input, and that object holding serves as a powerful cue for creating contingency in caregiver-child social interactions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.