Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110335›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2026

Simulated Improvements in Influence at Work and Reduction in Sickness Absence Among Young Employees: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.

Jeppe Karl Sørensen, Jimmi Mathisen, Jacob Pedersen, Hermann Burr, Anders Holm, Tea Lallukka, Maria Melchior, Naja Hulvej Rod, Reiner Rugulies, Børge Sivertsen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jeppe Karl SørensenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jimmi MathisenSection of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacob PedersenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hermann BurrUnit Psychosocial Factors and Mental Health, Department of Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Berlin, Germany.
Anders HolmDepartment of Sociology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Tea LallukkaDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Maria MelchiorSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Sociale (ERES), Paris, France.
Naja Hulvej RodSection of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Reiner RuguliesNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Børge SivertsenDepartment of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.
Stephen StansfeldCentre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Karl Bang ChristensenSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ida Elisabeth Huitfeldt MadsenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the reduction in sickness absence associated with simulated improvements in influence at work (employees' ability to influence how and when work tasks are performed) among young Danish employees. Methods: We used register data from the Danish Work Life Course Cohort, which included 301,185 individuals aged 15-30 who entered the labor market between 2010 and 2018 (mean follow-up: 2.6 years). Annual influence at work was assessed using a job-exposure matrix, which assigned an average level of influence based on job title. Inspired by the parametric g-formula, we used Poisson regression to predict sickness absence days under a simulated scenario in which the influence increased by one standard deviation. Results: Higher influence was associated with fewer days of sickness absence (rate ratio per one-point increase, range 1-5: 0.71, 95% CI 0.66-0.77). Simulating a standard deviation increase in influence corresponded to a reduction of 0.16 days of sickness absence per person annually, which is equivalent to an estimated reduction of 126,400 (3%) days during the follow-up period. The largest reductions were observed in care work and education. Conclusion: Simulated improvements in influence at work may lead to meaningful reductions in sickness absence among young employees.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismOccupational HealthSick LeaveAdolescentAdultDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleRegistriesYoung Adultinfluence at workjob-exposure matrixoccupational healthsickness absenceyoung workers

Identifiers

PMID42110335
PMCPMC13149206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.