ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Sex differences in response to COVID-19 infection: a retrospective study based on emergency medical team interventions.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected several aspects of daily life and seriously threatened public health. The main aim of this study was to investigate the differences in human response to SARS-CoV-2 virus infection depending on sex, based on emergency medical team (EMT) interventions. The study was conducted in north-eastern Poland and were based on 12,110 EMT interventions, in which SARS-CoV-2 virus infection was indicated as an ICD-10 codification-based diagnosis. The study used descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U, and Chi-square tests. Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 accounted for 4.6% of all EMT interventions during the period under analysis. Younger males were more likely to acquire infection than females (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.