ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Impact of a large-scale interactive and immersive science pop-up shop about infection and hygiene on visitors and volunteers.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infectious diseases pose persistent and evolving challenges to global health, exacerbated by rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and vaccine hesitancy. The global public response to the COVID-19 pandemic underscored that scientific knowledge alone cannot drive behavioural change without trust, dialogue and meaningful social participation. Effective science communication and public engagement therefore require interactive, community-centred approaches that address social and cultural barriers and foster shared understanding and collective responsibility. This study describes the development and evaluation of a free large-scale pop-up shop designed to improve public health literacy. Located in one of the UK's busiest shopping centres, the event was co-created and co-delivered by staff and students across four universities and combined playful, sensory, immersive learning with robust science through hands-on activities, exhibitions and live presentations. Incentives such as a sticker-based reward system and a treasure hunt encouraged sustained engagement. Over a 28-day period, 4,955 people attended, including organised school groups. Mixed-methods evaluation revealed positive shifts in public knowledge and attitudes, alongside an increased appreciation of the value of public engagement among those delivering the event. Embedding science within a public space proved effective in engaging diverse audiences, stimulating conversations around health and disease, and breaking down perceived barriers between scientists and the public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.