ArticleFrontiers in oral health2026
Migration background, oral hygiene behavior and oral health literacy: findings based on a quota-based sample.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To describe oral hygiene behavior and oral health literacy in the general adult German population (also stratified by migration background) and to identify the association of migration background with such outcomes. Methods: Data from the general adult German population aged 18-74 years was used (quota-based sample representative in terms of age, gender, and federal state). The analytic sample equaled 5,000 individuals, with mean age of 47 years, 51% being female, and 11% had a migration background. Common questions were employed to measure oral hygiene behavior, oral health literacy and migration background. Multiple logistic regressions were used to explore the association of migration background with oral hygiene behavior and oral health literacy. Results: A significant proportion reported not using oral hygiene products, with 35.5% not using an electric toothbrush (not using manual toothbrush: 28.1%), 59.4% not using fluoride gel, and 27.7% not using interdental cleaning aids. Additionally, 14.1% brushed their teeth for less than two minutes and 76.4% reported having at least good oral health literacy. Depending on migration background, some outcomes significantly varied. Adjusted multiple logistic regressions showed that having a migration background (compared to not having a migration background) was significantly associated with lower odds of using an electric toothbrush (OR = 0.79, 95% CI:0.66-0.95) and duration of tooth brushing (OR = 0.54, 95% CI:0.43-0.69). Conclusion: Data on oral health, use of different oral hygiene products, and oral health literacy among adults with migration background is limited. Our analysis adds to this knowledge and helps identify gaps and needs in this population to improve preventive measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.