SynthesisReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Association Between Vericiguat and Clinical Outcomes Across Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) remains a major global health burden, with mortality continuing to rise despite therapeutic advances. Vericiguat, a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, has demonstrated potential benefit in patients with worsening HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), although results across randomized trials have been inconsistent. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant articles from inception through September 30th, 2025. Outcomes were reported as pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was defined as a 95% confidence interval not crossing 1.0 with a two-tailed Results: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 12,877 patients (6857 in the vericiguat group and 6020 in the placebo group) were included. Vericiguat demonstrated a borderline but non-significant reduction in composite outcome of cardiovascular death (CVD) or hospitalization for HF (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-1.00; Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that Vericiguat, when added to guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure, was associated with a borderline, non-significant reduction in the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization, as well as all-cause mortality. Further large-scale randomized trials are warranted to better define its clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.