ArticleJPGN reports2026
Sentinel events in pediatric hepatology: A pilot simulation curriculum.
Article in JPGN reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sentinel events in pediatric hepatology: A pilot simulation curriculum.JPGN reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Sentinel hepatology events require robust prior experience to accurately diagnose and manage. Given the rarity of complex pediatric liver disease, gastroenterology (GI) fellows do not uniformly get exposure to these patients. We developed a simulation curriculum to ensure exposure to and improve confidence in diagnosis and management of these patients. Methods: Using needs assessment data, a simulation experience was developed, including two clinical scenarios, each mimicking several days of case evolution. Learning objectives included effective communication of diagnostic and management plans to medical teams and families. Targeted didactics were completed between phases. At the conclusion of the experience, fellows scored their confidence levels across learning objectives compared to a retrospective baseline. To assess longitudinal confidence, two similar online clinical cases were disseminated 5 months later with repeat confidence scoring. Results: Six of eight eligible fellows participated in the simulation experience. All participants reported that the curriculum was meaningful and decreased their anxiety caring for these patients. The collaborative structure fostered psychological safety and mitigated cognitive load. There was a statistically significant increase in self-assessed confidence for all learning objectives after the simulation. Conclusion: In the current training environment, it is difficult to attain autonomy in managing complex pediatric liver disease. This simulation is the first of its kind in pediatric GI to address diagnosis and management of complex chronic liver disease. The pilot was feasible, impactful, and could help standardize fellow training regardless of program size or transplant center designation, thereby impacting the care of children with liver disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.