Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110089›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Retained Lippes Loop Intrauterine Device (IUD) in a Woman With Post-menopausal Bleeding and Chronic Pelvic Pain.

Leila Neisani Samani, Elham Neisani Samani

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leila Neisani SamaniDepartment of Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRN.
Elham Neisani SamaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Garden City Hospital, Garden City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forgotten intrauterine devices (IUDs), particularly those retained for decades, can lead to complications in postmenopausal women, including bleeding and chronic pelvic pain. The Lippes Loop IUD, widely used from the 1960s to the 1980s, is now rarely encountered. We present the case of a 68-year-old woman with a forgotten Lippes Loop IUD who presented with chronic pelvic pain and postmenopausal bleeding. The patient was uncertain whether her IUD had been spontaneously expelled or removed. During a laparoscopic hysterectomy performed for postmenopausal bleeding, an intra-pelvic Lippes Loop IUD was discovered embedded in the cul-de-sac and successfully removed. The patient tolerated the procedure well, and her postoperative period was uneventful. Her symptoms resolved completely at follow-up. Removal of a retained IUD is highly recommended, particularly in postmenopausal women. Patients with an IUD presenting with postmenopausal bleeding and pelvic pain should be closely evaluated. We emphasize the importance of adequate counseling, regular follow-up for IUD users, and timely removal once the device has expired or is no longer indicated."

Indexed as

intrauterine devicelippes looppelvic painpost-menopausal bleedingretained iud

Identifiers

PMID42110089
PMCPMC13156021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.