ArticleCureus2026
Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury in 2025: Real World Causes, Referral Patterns, and Reconstruction Outcomes From a Tertiary Care Centre in a Sub-himalayan Region.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Despite widespread adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), major bile duct injuries (BDIs) continue to occur, particularly in real-world, resource-limited settings. Methods This retrospective study analysed a prospectively maintained BDI-benign biliary stricture registry at the hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) and gastrointestinal (GI) surgery unit of Indira Gandhi Medical College (IGMC), Shimla, a tertiary HPB referral centre in the sub-Himalayan region. All adult patients referred between January 2020 and December 2024 with major iatrogenic BDI requiring definitive surgical reconstruction were included. Minor biliary injuries managed conservatively or endoscopically were excluded. Demographic data, injury characteristics, surgeon experience, referral patterns, management, and outcomes were evaluated. Results Twenty-three patients underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for major BDIs. Most injuries occurred during LC (91.3%) and were associated with difficult gallbladder anatomy (73.9%). Seventeen injuries (73.9%) were caused by surgeons with less than three years of post-training experience (p = 0.028). Primary repair was attempted at the index centre in 43.5% of patients, frequently in high-grade injuries. Referral beyond 72 hours occurred in 91.3% of cases. Three additional patients with catastrophic vasculobiliary injury died before reconstruction. All reconstructed patients had favourable medium-term outcomes. Conclusion Major BDI remains largely preventable. Early referral, avoidance of unsafe repair, adoption of bailout strategies, structured early-career supervision, and improved infrastructure are essential to reduce preventable morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.