ReviewCureus2026
Testosterone Therapy in Women: A Literature Review of Clinical Indications, Dosing, Routes of Administration, and Safety.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Testosterone (T) therapy has been used to address symptoms in women such as low libido, fatigue, and mood disturbances. Despite nearly a century of global use and consistent patient demand, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has yet to approve a T formulation for women. This narrative review examines the physiological role of T in females, the clinical presentation of androgen insufficiency, and the evidence supporting T therapy in both pre-and post-menopausal women. Androgens are critical to female health, with T being the most abundant biologically active sex androgen in women. It is produced in the ovaries and adrenal glands and acts via androgen receptors found throughout the body. T levels in women decline gradually with age and more sharply following menopause or surgical oophorectomy, often resulting in symptoms like hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD), vasomotor symptoms, and mood changes. Diagnostic challenges persist due to inconsistent laboratory assays and hormonal variability, but a symptom-based clinical approach is increasingly recognized as more reliable than relying solely on serum levels. Evidence from decades of clinical use and numerous studies supports the safety and effectiveness of T therapy, particularly via subcutaneous implants and transdermal patches. Although concerns exist around supraphysiologic doses, these are often necessary for symptom relief and are generally well-tolerated. Adverse effects are typically mild and reversible, with acne and hirsutism being the most common. Existing long-term safety data, including from transgender medicines, have not yet shown increased risks of breast cancer or cardiovascular disease at therapeutic doses. In the absence of FDA-approved formulations for women, many patients rely on compounded therapies with variable quality and oversight. This regulatory gap limits access to standardized, evidence-based care. Given the widespread and growing use of T in women, long-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are urgently needed to establish clear dosing guidelines, safety parameters, and approval pathways. Women deserve access to regulated, effective treatments grounded in scientific evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.