Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109996›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Prediction of Discharge Functional Independence Measure Scores From Routine Admission Variables Using a ChatGPT-Assisted Workflow in Patients With Cerebral Infarction or Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Isao Uno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Isao UnoRehabilitation Medicine, Sakurajyuji Fukuoka Hospital, Fukuoka, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Predicting discharge functional status is important in stroke rehabilitation, but developing local prediction models often requires statistical and programming expertise. The primary objective of this study was to develop and internally validate prediction models for discharge Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores using routine admission variables. The secondary objective was to describe a locally executed ChatGPT-assisted workflow used only for template generation and code scaffolding. Methods  This single-center retrospective observational study included 377 patients with cerebral infarction or intracerebral hemorrhage admitted to the convalescent rehabilitation ward, a Japanese post-acute inpatient rehabilitation unit for patients who require intensive rehabilitation after acute treatment, of Sakurajyuji Fukuoka Hospital (Fukuoka, Japan) between April 2022 and March 2025. Predictors were age, days from stroke onset to admission, and admission FIM scores. Separate linear regression models were developed for discharge motor FIM and discharge cognitive FIM, and a direct model was developed for discharge total FIM. Internal validation used five-fold cross-validation with out-of-fold predictions. Model performance was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R²), and calibration metrics. Results The discharge motor FIM model yielded an MAE of 11.87, an RMSE of 14.69, and an R² of 0.680. The discharge cognitive FIM model yielded an MAE of 3.76, an RMSE of 4.98, and an R² of 0.731. The direct discharge total FIM model yielded an MAE of 14.55, an RMSE of 18.21, and an R² of 0.714. Calibration slopes were close to 1.0 for all outcomes, and repeated cross-validation showed minimal variation in prediction error. Conclusions Discharge FIM scores were moderately predictable with good calibration using a small set of routinely available admission variables. A locally executed ChatGPT-assisted workflow was feasible for template generation and code scaffolding, but formal evaluation of clinical usefulness, transparent reporting, human verification, and external validation remain necessary.

Indexed as

convalescent rehabilitation wardfunctional independence measurelarge language modelsrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID42109996
PMCPMC13154333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.