ArticleInternational journal of hypertension2026
Correlation of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure in Measuring Blood Pressure Using Validated Digital Wrist Monitor Versus Validated Digital Arm Monitor: Study in a Real-World Setting.
Article in International journal of hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correlation of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure in Measuring Blood Pressure Using Validated Digital Wrist Monitor Versus Validated Digital Arm Monitor: Study in a Real-World Setting.International journal of hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wrist-cuff blood pressure (wBP) monitors in the market have gained popularity due to their cost, portability, acceptability, and accessibility. Although wide variability in wrist versus the standard arm BP (aBP) monitor values has been reported, comparative investigations in a real-world setting has not been fully elucidated. This study was undertaken to correlate systolic and diastolic BP using wBP versus the standard aBP monitors, to determine discrepancies, if any, and to formulate recommendations for its use. Adult subjects with normal, mild, or moderate hypertension randomly recruited in the investigators' clinics were included. Complete medical history and physical examination were done, and standard positioning for BP measurements was followed. Validated wrist BP (Omron, HEM6161) and validated aBP (Omron, HEM7156) monitors were used. The statistical data were analyzed with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.