Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109868›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Leveraging artificial intelligence in bioacoustics for animal health monitoring and early diagnosis in veterinary medicine.

Hannah Rideout, Anthony D Whetton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hannah RideoutVeterinary Health Innovation Engine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Anthony D WhettonVeterinary Health Innovation Engine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of animal communications, termed zoosemiotics, includes the sub-field of bioacoustics, the study of the production, transmission, and reception of animal sounds. It is becoming increasingly apparent that inter- and intra-species communication is sophisticated with sound playing a major role in this signaling. Artificial intelligence-led research can be employed to understand and combine recorded multi-level data (sound, vision, odors) to classify animal health and identify interventions, also determining critical time-points for intervention. This can include subgroup discovery and trajectory analysis as essential elements in developing animal specific identification of failure to thrive or ill health. It is important that animals, carers, and veterinarians receive as early a diagnosis as possible to predict trajectory and plan care needs and interventions. However, the use of quantitative data for evidence-led interventions based on sound have not yet been developed. Here we look at advances in bioacoustics and provide a framework to determine where early diagnosis and animal health improvements can be made via understanding of behavior and oral sound production.

Indexed as

acoustic listeningacoustic sequencesacoustic soundanimal healthanimal soundsanthropogenic soundsbioacoustic analysisveterinary medicine

Identifiers

PMID42109868
PMCPMC13155404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.