ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
Unmet health care needs in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura survivors.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare thrombotic microangioathy episodic life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy. Survivors of iTTP have high rates of chronic morbidities in remission such as depression, cognitive impairment, stroke, and increased cardiovascular mortality. Careful multidisciplinary management during clinical remission is needed to monitor for relapse and manage comorbidities, but this may not be universally available. Objectives: To identify gaps in the outpatient care of iTTP survivors. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey-based study. The questionnaire included demographic information, disease-specific information, treatment-specific information, and the Healthcare Access and Utilization Survey developed by the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program. Results: A total of 281 participants responded to the survey. Median age was 47 years (IQR, 34-60 years). Most respondents were women (255/278, 91.7%), White (206/281, 73.7%), and highly educated with 215 of 263 (81.7%) reporting some college or further education. A quarter of respondents, 67 of 247 (27.1%), had not seen a hematologist in the past year, and 48 of 247 (19.4%) had not seen a primary care provider. Additionally, 45 of 279 (16.1%) reported not having an iTTP doctor. Laboratory monitoring was performed every 6 months or less frequently in 38% of respondents. Treatment for relapse prevention was not discussed with 54.8%. While 82.7% self-reported mental health disturbance after iTTP diagnosis, 30.4% had been referred to a mental health professional. Conclusion: In this United States-based cohort, despite high rates of medical and psychiatric comorbidities, only a minority reported high-quality relapse-prevention care. There were high rates of mental health disturbances after iTTP diagnosis but limited access to mental health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.