Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109841›Full record

ArticleInterest groups & advocacy2026

Lobbying, fast and slow: principles of influence beyond reason.

Iskander De Bruycker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interest groups & advocacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Iskander De BruyckerMaastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research agenda article presents a novel perspective on lobbying influence by distinguishing between two modes of lobbying: fast and slow. Fast lobbying targets intuitive, heuristic-based decision-making, while slow lobbying engages deliberate, effortful cognitive processes among policymakers. The prevailing interest group literature has largely focused on the latter, conceptualizing lobbying as a rational, evidence-driven exchange. However, this article argues that lobbying influence extends beyond conscious deliberation to include subconscious persuasion. It reinterprets psychological insights-particularly Robert Cialdini's seven principles of influence-as tools for understanding how intuitive persuasion shapes elite decision-making. While these principles are widely recognized in behavioral economics and marketing, their implications for political influence remain underexplored. The article examines the extent to which such mechanisms have been integrated into interest group research and highlights areas that remain neglected. It bridges cognitive and social psychology with interest group research to conceptualize fast lobbying as a distinct and underexamined mode of influence. The article concludes by outlining a research agenda and raising ethical questions about the role of intuitive persuasion in democratic policymaking.

Indexed as

Cognitive biasInfluenceInterest groupsLobbyingPersuasion

Identifiers

PMID42109841
PMCPMC13148985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.