ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2015
Scientific Opinion on the effect assessment for pesticides on sediment organisms in edge-of-field surface water.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sediment Toxicity Tests: A Critical Review of Their use in Environmental Regulations.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2024Review
- Improving the design and conduct of aquatic toxicity studies with oils based on 20 years of CROSERF experience.Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Comparison of Species Sensitivity Distributions for Sediment-Associated Nonionic Organic Chemicals Through Equilibrium Partitioning Theory and Spiked-Sediment Toxicity Tests with Invertebrates.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2022Article
- Statement of the PPR Panel on a framework for conducting the environmental exposure and risk assessment for transition metals when used as active substances in plant protection products (PPP).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
- Scientific report of EFSA on the 'repair action' of the FOCUS surface water scenarios.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
- The environmental condition of an estuarine ecosystem disturbed by pesticides.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Article
- Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the environment.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
- Freshwater neotropical oligochaetes as native test species for the toxicity evaluation of cadmium, mercury and their mixtures.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2019Article
- Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
- Sensitivities of three tropical indigenous freshwater invertebrates to single and mixture exposures of diuron and carbofuran and their commercial formulations.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2018Article
- Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018Article
- Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018Article
- Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance copper compounds copper(I), copper(II) variants namely copper hydroxide, copper oxychloride, tribasic copper sulfate, copper(I) oxide, Bordeaux mixture.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018Review
- Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for in-soil organisms.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2017Article
- Scientific Opinion on the effect assessment for pesticides on sediment organisms in edge-of-field surface water.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) was tasked to revise the Guidance Document (GD) on Aquatic Ecotoxicology under Council Directive 91/414/EEC (SANCO/3268/2001 rev. 4 (final), 17 October 2002). This scientific opinion of the PPR Panel is the second of three requested deliverables within this mandate. The scientific background for the risk assessment on sediment organisms in edge-of-field surface waters is provided, with reference to benthic ecology and ecotoxicology, available test protocols and current knowledge on exposure and effects of sediment-bound plant protection products (PPPs). The scientific opinion provides approaches on how to derive regulatory acceptable concentrations (RACs) for sediment organisms and exposure to active substances of PPPs and transformation products of these substances, and how to link them in a tiered approach to predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) for the sediment compartment. A list of uncertainties in relation to such approaches is given.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.