ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Interval-compressed chemotherapy in patients with Ewing's sarcoma: report on feasibility and toxicity from a North African center.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ewing's sarcoma (ES) is the second most common malignant bone tumor in patients under 20 years of age. The "Euro-Ewing 2012" trial established induction therapy with the 2-week-interval VDC/IE (Vincristine-Doxorubicine-Cyclophosphamide/Ifosfamide-Etoposide) as the standard of care. However, real-world data remain limited. We aimed to determine the feasibility, tolerance, and effectiveness of this protocol. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-institutional cohort study, including patients with ES treated between January 2018 and April 2024 using the interval-compressed VDC/IE protocol. Data were collected on feasibility, toxicity, and outcomes. Results: We included 27 patients. Median age at diagnosis was 18.3 years. Sekeletal tumors predominated (89%), mainly in the pelvis and lower limbs. Metastatic disease was present at diagnosis in 41%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was initiated after a median delay of 36 days post-biopsy, with a median duration of 22 weeks and a mean interval of 19.8 days. The mean relative dose intensity (RDI) was 70%, with only 11% of patients achieving an RDI >85%. A lower RDI was observed in adults (p=0.011) and metastatic stage patients (p=0.011). High-grade toxicities were reported in 89% of patients, primarily neutropenia. Good pathologic response was reported in 11 patients. After a median follow-up of 26 months, the median OS was 32 months, with 3-year OS and EFS rates of 36.9% and 19.9%, respectively. The relapse rate was 67%, with a median relapse time of 13 months. Conclusion: This study highlights the challenges of implementing the EE2012 protocol in our practice. Adapting the regimen could optimize induction, particularly for localized forms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.