ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
Predicting progression of Alzheimer's disease using blood-based multi-omics data.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Early prediction of Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains a major challenge, particularly when relying on non-invasive biomarkers. Identifying individuals with progressive MCI (pMCI) before conversion to AD could improve intervention strategies and clinical management. In this study, we developed a machine learning (ML) framework integrating blood-based multi-omics and demographic data to distinguish pMCI from stable MCI (sMCI). Results: We trained ML models using combinations of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), DNA methylation, gene expression, lipid, and bile acid metabolite data using both early and late data integration strategies. Late integration consistently outperformed early integration, with the L1-regularized logistic regression model achieving the highest F1 score of 90.7% when combining SNP and lipid data. Feature interpretability analyses using LIME and SHAP identified reproducible biomarkers across omic layers, including SNPs in MYH11, FOXP1, MAPK10, and SYN3; methylation changes in CDX2 and DHX58; and altered ceramide lipid CER.D19.1.24.0 levels, all previously associated with AD-related pathology. These findings demonstrate that combining multi-omics and demographic data can improve early prediction of AD progression and support the feasibility of blood-based, interpretable biomarkers for precision diagnostics. Availability and implementation: The data analyzed in this study were obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (https://adni.loni.usc.edu/) and are available to qualified researchers upon application. The code used in this study, together with instructions and a toy dataset, is available at: https://github.com/bozdaglab/AD_sMCI_vs_pMCI.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.