Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109573›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Primary care2026

Embedding social prescribing in primary care in England and Scotland: a qualitative study of experiences, roles, challenges, and sustainability.

Eddie Donaghy, Stewart W Mercer, Heather Brant, Hilllary Collins, Manal Etemadi, Yuri Hamashima, Hugh McLeod, Catherine A O'Donnell, Caroline Sanders, Mihirini Sirisena and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eddie DonaghyUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Stewart W MercerUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Heather BrantBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol and National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West), Bristol, UK.
Hilllary CollinsGeneral Practice and Primary Care, School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Manal EtemadiBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol and National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West), Bristol, UK.
Yuri HamashimaBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol and National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West), Bristol, UK.
Hugh McLeodBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol and National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West), Bristol, UK.
Catherine A O'DonnellGeneral Practice and Primary Care, School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Caroline SandersCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Mihirini SirisenaPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Paul WilsonCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the last decade, social prescribing through link workers based in general practice has become a major policy in the UK, but little is known about the implementation of this strategy. We aimed to explore the roles, challenges, and effects of social prescribing link workers (SPLWs) across different models of employment, organisation, and management in England and Scotland. Methods: In this qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with stakeholders in two regions in England (National Institute for Health and care Research [NIHR] Applied Research Collaboration [ARC] West and NIHR ARC North East and North Cumbria) and two in Scotland (National Health Service [NHS] Greater Glasgow & Clyde and NHS Lothian). Stakeholders were participants actively involved in SPLW activities and comprised patients aged 18 years or older receiving SPLW support; individual SPLWs; general practice staff who referred patients to the SPLW; leads of voluntary, community, and social enterprises (VCSEs) employing or hosting SPLWs; VCSE leads not employing or hosting SPLWs but supporting referred patients; and strategic leaders working with SPLW services. Purposive sampling was used to ensure diversity in patients' age, gender, and socioeconomic deprivation (according to the Index of Multiple Deprivation in England or Sottish Index of Multiple Deprivation in Scotland) and variation in stakeholder roles. Interviews were continued until data saturation was reached. Transcribed interviews were analysed reflexively using inductive thematic analysis. Findings: Between Feb 16 and Nov 15, 2024, we conducted interviews with 130 stakeholders: 36 SPLWs, 28 patients, 28 referring professionals, ten VCSE leads hosting SPLWs, 14 VCSE leads not hosting SPLWs, and 14 strategic leads. Patient ages ranged from 18 years to older than 65 years; 16 (57%) patients were female, 12 (43%) were male, 26 (93%) were of White British or Scottish ethnicity, one (4%) was of south Asian ethnicity, and one (4%) was of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Six key themes emerged. The first was varied backgrounds, with SPLWs typically coming from the voluntary sector or NHS, driven by a desire to empower patients. The second was changing role, with SPLWs now seeing many more patients with highly complex needs, including the social determinants of health in deprived areas, than they did previously. The third theme was therapeutic relationship, whereby building empathic relationships was crucial but depended on SPLWs' backgrounds, training, and support. The fourth theme, benefits of the SPLWs, was based on SPLWs helping patients to build confidence and increase their independence and, in general practitioners, reducing moral distress and possibly reducing workload. The fifth theme was employment models, organisation, and management, with integration into general practices facilitated by SPLWs working in one or two practices and with robust organisational support. For the final theme, challenges and sustainability, the challenges of the SPLW role included job retention, burnout, variable pay levels, and few opportunities for career progression; the sustainability of this role was threatened by short-term funding, increased service demand, and financial cuts to essential services. Interpretation: This study highlights the vital role of SPLWs in England and Scotland and the need for stable support and funding amid ongoing financial challenges in the statutory and voluntary sectors. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Identifiers

PMID42109573
PMCPMC13154165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.