ReviewNature and science of sleep2026
Sleep and Subjective Age: A Narrative Review of Epidemiological Evidence, Underlying Mechanisms, and Population Differences.
Review in Nature and science of sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subjective age-how old an individual feels-is a robust predictor of health outcomes and mortality independent of chronological age. Sleep, as a fundamental and modifiable health behavior, has been increasingly implicated as a determinant of subjective aging, yet the evidence remains fragmented across disciplines. This narrative review synthesizes current knowledge on the association between sleep problems and subjective age by critically appraising epidemiological evidence, delineating potential mechanistic pathways, and examining population-level moderators. Converging evidence from cross-sectional surveys, longitudinal cohorts, and one randomized crossover trial consistently demonstrates that poor sleep quality and insufficient sleep are associated with older subjective age. Daytime sleepiness is the only mediator with preliminary empirical support; additional candidate pathways-including accelerated brain aging, cortisol rhythm dysregulation, impaired emotional regulation, and appearance-related social feedback-remain theoretically plausible but empirically untested. The association appears stronger in women, middle-aged and older adults, and morning chronotypes, although moderator evidence is limited. Critical gaps persist, including the absence of chronic sleep intervention trials in older populations, near-exclusive reliance on self-reported sleep measures, and insufficient mechanistic research. Future priorities include prospective studies integrating objective sleep assessment, randomized trials of evidence-based sleep interventions targeting subjective age in midlife and older populations, and direct testing of the proposed multi-level mechanistic framework. These findings position sleep health as a promising yet underexplored leverage point for promoting psychological healthy aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.