ArticleCrystal growth & design2026
Can Machine Learning Predict the Space Group Preference of Organic Molecules?
Article in Crystal growth & design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficient Organic Molecular Crystal Structure Prediction Using the Density Functional Tight-Binding Method.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crystal structure prediction (CSP) is a valuable computational technique used to anticipate the likely crystal structures of a compound of interest. These methods have been proven useful in research and development of pharmaceutical solid forms and in guiding the discovery of materials with targeted properties. Despite success of CSP in these areas, its widespread application remains limited by computational cost. One approach to reduce the computational cost of CSP is to limit the search space of generated crystal structures; it is common practice to limit the search to a selection of the most frequently observed space groups, with the associated risk of excluding the space group of an observed crystal structure. As an attempt to reduce computational cost and ambiguity when choosing a set of space groups for CSP, we investigate the use of machine learning models to predict the most likely space group(s) of a given organic molecule. We find that both random forests and graph neural networks provide accuracies far above random, and better than what is achieved by selecting based on the overall space group frequencies observed for organic molecular crystals. The best model, using a graph neural network, achieves a maximum accuracy of 47.2% for single (top-1) space group prediction, which is an improvement of 8.2% above the reference. This model was trained with 3-dimensional molecular information, which improved accuracies compared to a model trained with only 2-dimensional bonding information. Furthermore, we found that random forest models performed best when both chemical and geometric molecular features are included in training, which indicates that both are important in defining a molecule's preferred space groups.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.