Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109509›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in allergy2026

Diagnostics and monitoring in Hymenoptera venom allergy: current and future perspectives.

Weronika Wilińska, Aleksandra Starosz, Kamil Grubczak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weronika WilińskaDepartment of Regenerative Medicine and Immune Regulation, Medical University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland.
Aleksandra StaroszDepartment of Regenerative Medicine and Immune Regulation, Medical University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland.
Kamil GrubczakDepartment of Regenerative Medicine and Immune Regulation, Medical University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hymenoptera stings are a major trigger of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, yet only a minority of exposed individuals develop systemic reactions, making accurate diagnosis essential but complex. This review synthesizes current evidence across clinical, serologic, cellular and molecular diagnostic modalities in Hymenoptera venom allergy. Clinical history and epidemiologic predictors-such as occupation, cumulative sting exposure, reaction latency, comorbidities and quality-of-life impairment, provide crucial context but lack sufficient predictive power when used alone. Skin prick and intradermal testing remain first-line tools due to high sensitivity, although interpretation is limited by interspecies cross-reactivity, extract variability and reduced reliability shortly after a sting. Serum IgE and component-resolved diagnostics improve species identification but are influenced by cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants and cannot reliably predict reaction severity or venom-immunotherapy outcomes. Basal and acute tryptase measurements contribute significantly to risk stratification and detection of clonal mast-cell disorders, though normal values do not exclude severe reactions. Functional assays, including basophil activation testing, histamine-release assays and emerging mast-cell activation platforms, provide dynamic confirmation of effector-cell reactivity in diagnostically challenging cases. Controlled sting challenge remains the reference method for confirming clinical reactivity or protection but is reserved for selected high-risk patients due to inherent procedural risks. Novel biomarkers such as osteopontin, KIT mutations, PGD

Indexed as

Hymenoptera venom allergyKIT mutationsmulti-omic molecular profilesosteopontinPGD2 metabolitesregulatory t-cell signatures

Identifiers

PMID42109509
PMCPMC13153041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.