Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109466›Full record

ReviewAfrican journal of disability2026

Navigating the adaptation of CBT for persons with disabilities in South Africa: An autoethnographic perspective.

Ramokone Kunutu, Sibusiso Ntshangase

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in African journal of disability, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ramokone KunutuDepartment of Inclusive Education, College of Education, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7895-6212
Sibusiso NtshangaseDepartment of Psychology of Education, College of Education, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2979-0224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), a western-developed therapy, may offer benefits to persons with disabilities. However, its applicability in South Africa, where stigma and limited resources significantly impact mental health, is uncertain. Objectives: This autoethnography explores the first author's personal experiences in adapting CBT for persons with disabilities in South Africa, focusing on culturally sensitive interventions and innovative delivery methods. Method: Spanning a year, data collection included personal journaling, field notes and reflexive memos. Rooted in constructivist epistemology, the study employed thematic analysis to integrate the first author's personal narrative with the broader cultural context. Results: The study chronicles the discovery of innovative delivery methods, such as telehealth, and emphasises the critical importance of training local health professionals. Key findings address the evidence base for CBT, the successes and failures of adaptations, the knowledge gaps identified and promising directions for a more inclusive future. Conclusion: This autoethnography reflects on the path towards a mental health care system that effectively addresses the unique needs of persons with disabilities in South Africa. Contribution: The study provides insights into the adaptation of CBT for a specific cultural context, highlighting the importance of culturally sensitive interventions and innovative delivery methods to improve mental health care for persons with disabilities in resource-constrained settings.

Indexed as

CBTcognitive behaviour therapymental healthpersons with disabilitieswestern-developed therapy

Identifiers

PMID42109466
PMCPMC13149934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.