ArticleBioinformation2026
Nursing intervention for severity of urinary incontinence.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary incontinence (UI) is a highly prevalent health problem among postmenopausal women ending in silent suffering. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the feasibility and effect of tailored, Evidence-based nursing intervention on severity of UI symptoms. Quasi experimental time series repeated measures design was used. Two old age homes were randomly assigned for an interventional and control setting. Ten post-menopausal women, selected by non-randomized purposive sampling from each setting were assigned to an interventional (n=10) and control group (n=10) respectively. The severity of Urinary incontinence in both groups was assessed using International Consultation on Incontinence (ICIQ -UI SF) questionnaire. The interventional group women received the nursing intervention for 12 weeks, whereas the control group continued to receive the usual care. The severity of urinary Incontinence was assessed at the end of 4th, 8th and 12th weeks. Repeated measures ANOVA of pre-test and post-test-III scores in Interventional group (F= 18.46, P ≤ 0.001) was significant. In control group, there was no significant difference (F = 1.47, P ≥ 0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.