ArticleBioinformation2026
Propofol-dexmedetomidine versus propofol-ketamine for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sedation.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep sedation during elective endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) ensures immobility, success and stability in prone positions, yet propofol monotherapy risks hypotension, bradycardia and respiratory depression. Therefore, it is of interest to compare propofol-dexmedetomidine (PD) versus propofol-ketamine (PK) in 120 ASA I-III adults undergoing ERCP. PD provided superior hemodynamic stability (MAP fluctuation 7.9±3.1% vs. 13.8±4.7%, p=0.001), reduced propofol needs (178±46 mg vs. 241±59 mg, p=0.001) and faster recovery (11.8±3.4 vs. 17.2±5.1 min, p=0.001). Endoscopists rated PD sedation quality higher, with fewer interruptions and better patient tolerance during the procedure. PD advances ERCP sedation by offering safer, more efficient alternatives to common regimens, minimizing complications while optimizing outcomes in high-risk prone procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.