Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109411›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Comparison of unidirectional barbed knotless suture versus vicryl rapide suture for intraoral wound closure in maxillofacial trauma: A clinical study.

Sarabpreet Kaur, Tejinder Kaur, Amit Dhawan, Sarika Kapila, Ramandeep Singh Bhullar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarabpreet KaurDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Sri Amritsar, Amritsar, India.
Tejinder KaurDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Sri Amritsar, Amritsar, India.
Amit DhawanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Sri Amritsar, Amritsar, India.
Sarika KapilaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Sri Amritsar, Amritsar, India.
Ramandeep Singh BhullarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Sri Amritsar, Amritsar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The challenge in maxillofacial trauma is achieving effective intraoral wound closure with optimal healing outcomes. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the efficacy of unidirectional knotless barbed suture with Vicryl Rapide suture for intraoral wound closure. Thirty fracture sites were divided into two groups, with group I using 3-0 knotless barbed suture and group II using 3-0 Vicryl Rapide. Results showed that suturing time was shorter in group I and wound healing were superior in group I at both 7 and 14 days. Thus, we show that knotless barbed suture is an effective choice for maxillofacial wound closure, requiring surgeons to understand suture biomechanics for optimal material selection.

Indexed as

Barbed suturehealingmaxillofacial traumasuturing timevicryl rapide

Identifiers

PMID42109411
PMCPMC13150288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.