Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109402›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Association of cigarette smoking intensity and pack-years with metabolic syndrome: A cross-sectional study.

Nishath Sayed Abdul, Shivakumar Ganiga Channaiah, Shubham Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nishath Sayed AbdulDepartment of Oral Pathology, People's College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, People's University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Shivakumar Ganiga ChannaiahDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, People's College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Peoples University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Shubham PatelDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, People's College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Peoples University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between cigarette smoking intensity, cumulative exposure and metabolic syndrome remains inadequately characterized despite smoking being a known metabolic risk factor. Therefore, it is of interest to examine the association of smoking status, intensity and pack-years with metabolic syndrome and its individual components among 200 adults using standardized questionnaires and logistic regression analysis. Metabolic syndrome was present in 35.0% of participants and showed a progressive increase from never smokers (24.4%) to former smokers (35.0%) and current smokers (48.6%). Among current smokers, prevalence rose in a dose-dependent manner from light to heavy smoking and was accompanied by higher frequencies of central obesity, low HDL cholesterol and elevated triglycerides. Both smoking intensity and cumulative pack-year exposure were independently associated with a graded increase in the prevalence and odds of metabolic syndrome. By showing a distinct dose-dependent relationship between cigarette smoking intensity, cumulative pack-years, and metabolic syndrome instead of evaluating smoking status alone, the current study builds on previous research. In addition to highlighting cumulative smoking exposure as an independent and clinically significant predictor of metabolic syndrome, this offers more support for quantitative risk stratification.

Indexed as

cardiometabolic riskCigarette smokingcross-sectional studymetabolic syndromepack-yearssmoking intensity

Identifiers

PMID42109402
PMCPMC13150173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.