Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109376›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Comparative evaluation of two surgical approaches for vertical ridge augmentation in the mandible.

Prateek Mishra, Sonali Priyadarshini Sahu, Lekha Tanwar, Mahesh Ghadage, Pranita Dalave, Devashree Shukla, Tanvi Hirani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prateek MishraDepartment of Dentistry, Medical Officer (Dental), District Hospital, Jabalpur, India.
Sonali Priyadarshini SahuDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Hi-tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India.
Lekha TanwarDepartment of Dentistry, Indira Gandhi District Hospital, Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Mahesh GhadageDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, India.
Pranita DalaveDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, India.
Devashree ShuklaDepartment of Dentistry, LN Medical College and JK Hospital Kolar Road Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Tanvi HiraniDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertical mandibular ridge deficiency challenges implant placement and stability in prosthetic dentistry. Therefore, it is of interest to compare guided bone regeneration (GBR) with titanium mesh versus autogenous onlay block grafting in 76 patients needing pre-prosthetic augmentation. Both yielded similar vertical bone gains (4.82±1.24 mm GBR versus. 5.14±1.38 mm block, p=0.284), supporting implant success. Block grafting had higher resorption (18.4% versus. 12.2%, p=0.028) and donor morbidity (26.3% versus. 0%, p<0.001), while GBR showed more membrane exposure (21.1% versus. 7.9%, p=0.024). GBR advances ridge augmentation by matching block graft efficacy with lower morbidity, guiding less invasive implant site development.

Indexed as

autogenous bone graftdental implantsguided bone regeneration (GBR)pre-prosthetic surgerytitanium meshVertical ridge augmentation

Identifiers

PMID42109376
PMCPMC13150226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.