Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109368›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

A comparative clinical study of stress distribution around implant supporting all - on - four versus all - on - 6 prosthetic concepts.

Pudi Sriharsha, Vivek Anne, Tejosmita Chowdary Pavuluri, Nitish Tyagi, Ranishree Behera, Sreeja Gummalla, Vikas Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pudi SriharshaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Sangareddy, Telangana, India.
Vivek AnneDepartment of Epidemiology, MPH(Epidemiology), Laramie Pediatrics & Internal Medicine pc, 1252 N 22nd St Unit B, Laramie, WY 82072.
Tejosmita Chowdary PavuluriDepartment of Biomedical Tejosmita Chowdary Pavuluri, BDS, M.S. Biomedical Sciences (Dental Scholars Track) Candidate, Sciences, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Newark, New Jersey, 07107, USA.
Nitish TyagiDepartment of Periodontology, Family Dental Care, Delhi Dental Council, Delhi, India.
Ranishree BeheraDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Hitech Dental College and Hospital, Odisha, India.
Sreeja GummallaDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vikas SinghDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental college & Research Centre, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal distribution of stress and preservation of bone in implant-supported prostheses remain critical factors affecting the long-term success of full-arch rehabilitations. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the stress distribution and clinical outcomes of the All-on-Four versus All-on-Six prosthetic concepts in full-arch rehabilitation. Hence, a total of 200 participants were divided into two groups, with 100 participants receiving All-on-Four and 100 receiving All-on-Six implants. This study advances knowledge by providing empirical evidence that the All-on-Six prosthetic concept offers better stress distribution, bone preservation and implant stability.

Indexed as

All-on-fourall-on-sixbone preservationimplant stabilitystress distribution

Identifiers

PMID42109368
PMCPMC13150235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.