ArticleBioinformation2026
Mortality comparison in acute myocardial infarction patients according to presence versus absence of traditional modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) like hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and smoking strongly predict AMI, yet many patients lack these. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 580 consecutive Type 1 AMI admissions, stratifying into SMuRF-less (0 factors) versus those with ≥1 SMuRF. SMuRF-less patients showed significantly higher in-hospital mortality (10.9% vs. 5.2%, p=0.03). They also exhibited increased cardiogenic shock frequency compared to the SMuRF-present group. SMuRF-less AMI advances understanding by revealing paradoxical mortality risk, necessitating expanded screening beyond traditional factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.