ArticleBioinformation2026
Diagnostic performance of serum CA-125 and ultrasonography in ovarian tumour differentiation.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early differentiation of benign versus malignant ovarian tumours is crucial for optimal management but remains challenging in many clinical settings. This analytical cross-sectional study at Rangpur Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh, included 62 surgically managed ovarian tumours (48 benign, 14 malignant) evaluated preoperatively by transabdominal ultrasonography and serum CA-125. Ultrasonography alone yielded a sensitivity of 57.42%, specificity 89.50%, PPV 61.84%, NPV 87.42% and accuracy 82.17%. Serum CA-125 showed better performance, with a sensitivity 71.42%, specificity 93.75%, PPV 76.92%, NPV 91.83% and accuracy 88.70%. Combining ultrasonography with CA-125 improved diagnostic accuracy to 91.32% (sensitivity 78.57%, specificity 93.75%), advancing preoperative triage by providing a simple, high-yield strategy for resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.