ArticleBioinformation2026
Anti-VEGF versus laser photocoagulation for ROP treatment.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vascular disease of the developing retina and a key, but mostly avoidable, cause of blindness in infants (especially preterm and very low birth weight infants). Hence in this prospective comparative cohort study of 1188 screened infants, 77 infants needed treatment; 67 of them received intravitreal anti-VEGF and 10 received laser photocoagulation. Intravitreal anti-VEGF has shown anatomical regression in 96.82 of treated eyes; of which 3.17% required auxiliary laser and primary laser anatomical success was 100% but ablate the peripheral retina more and theoretically presents a greater risk of myopic shift. Aggressive posterior ROP (APROP) which was observed in 5.5 percent of the cohort responded to anti -VEGF in most cases, although isolated but serious complications were identified including cataract and retinal detachment, which demonstrates the importance of careful long-term follow-up. Thus Anti-VEGF was also useful in Type 1 ROP, but the current study also makes progress in demonstrating in a clinical setting that anti-VEGF can yield high regression with low adjunctive laser and superior peripheral retinal sparing, as opposed to laser which has a little higher one-time anatvi-success, indicating that a customized, zone- and stage-based, risk-benefit-driven decision on which therapy to use in any infant is possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.