Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109316›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Perception and satisfaction in patients using clear aligners versus fixed orthodontic appliances.

Prashant Patil, Girish Polavaram Vasudeva Setty, Bareera Shafiuddin, Altaf Hussain, Sunanda Paul, Riyas Karim, Md Kafeel Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prashant PatilDepartment of Orthodontics, Al Badar Dental College and Hospital, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India.
Girish Polavaram Vasudeva SettyNeuromuscular Orthodontist, Private Practice, Smile Architect Dental, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Bareera ShafiuddinOrthodontist Consultant, Doha, Qatar.
Altaf HussainSpecialist Orthodontist, Qimat Altieb Medical Complex, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sunanda PaulDepartment of Orthodontics Dentofacial and Orthopaedics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Silchar, Assam, India.
Riyas KarimDepartment of Periodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Kothamangalam, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Md Kafeel AhmedDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Sangareddy, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient satisfaction drives orthodontic treatment success, yet clear aligners (CA) versus fixed appliances (FA) comparisons remains inconclusive. This prospective cohort study assessed psychosocial impact, satisfaction and OHRQoL in 120 patients over 12 months using validated questionnaires at multiple timepoints. CA users reported significantly higher aesthetic satisfaction throughout (p<0.001), with 78.3% rating aesthetics excellent vs 41.7% in FA at 12 months. Comfort scores strongly favored CA (p<0.001), while oral health- related quality of life (OHRQoL) was comparable at endpoint (p=0.342) despite similar treatment durations. Clear aligners advance orthodontic practice as an aesthetically superior, comfortable alternative that matches fixed appliance functional outcomes.

Indexed as

adult orthodonticsaesthetic perceptionClear alignersfixed orthodontic appliancesoral health-related quality of lifepatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42109316
PMCPMC13150237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.