ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2026
Uncertainty-Aware Machine Learning for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis Using Breast MRI.
Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) is a significant prognostic factor in breast cancer and has an impact on staging, treatment and survival. The objective of this study is to create a machine learning model that will be able to predict axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in a preoperative setting using breast MRI-derived and clinicopathological variables, while also achieving probability calibration and uncertainty-aware prediction for more reliable risk estimates. Patients and Methods: For this retrospective single-centre study, 204 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced breast MRI from 2021 to 2024 were selected. The dataset comprised of 23 independent variables, respectively, representing demographic, clinical, radiological, histopathological, molecular characteristics along with a binary target variable indicating ALNM status. The data was split into 60% called training set, 20% calibration set, and 20% test set. Candidate models were evaluated based on ROC-AUC on the training subset that was used for screening. Subsequently, calibration was performed in a held-out calibration set, following which class-conditional conformal prediction was applied to quantify predictive uncertainty. Results: Out of all the models we evaluated, the Conformal-Calibrated Interpretable Risk Model (CCIRM) was found to be the best model, achieving a test accuracy of 0.9268, a weighted F1 score of 0.9270 and AUC of 0.937. With a precision of 0.9545 and a recall of 0.9130 in the ALNM-positive class, the model was potent. In addition to discrimination strength, the framework produces calibrated risk estimates and uncertainty-aware prediction sets that enable transparent interpretation of model outputs in clinically borderline cases. Conclusion: The proposed approach includes the model selection based on the machine learning and probability calibration, as well as conformal prediction to achieve reliability, beyond label prediction, and uncertainty-aware risk estimation for preoperative ALNM assessment. The results from this analysis suggest that CCIRM is a potential methodological framework for trustworthy clinical decision support, although the prospective and multicentre external validation should be done before it becomes applicable to the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.