Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109309›Full record

ArticleComputational economics2026

Opinion Dynamic and Social Clustering in a 2D Space: An Agent Based Experiment.

Francesco Pasimeni, Robert Wade, Floor Alkemade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational economics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesco PasimeniTechnology, Innovation and Society Research Group, Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Atlas 5.402, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4255-2180
Robert WadeTechnology, Innovation and Society Research Group, Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Atlas 5.402, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5882-4059
Floor AlkemadeTechnology, Innovation and Society Research Group, Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Atlas 5.402, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2231-1913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of movement and interactions of individuals on opinion dynamics and polarisation within a two-dimensional (2D) space. By extending the Attraction-Repulsion Model (ARM), we explore how agents form opinion clusters based on geographic constraints and social interactions. Our model illustrates that individuals with similar opinions tend to form like-minded groups, with higher visibility leading to fewer, larger clusters. Conversely, low tolerance drives high polarisation. Geographic constraints result in larger clusters centralising to avoid conflicts, while smaller clusters remain peripheral. Additionally, as the number of opinion dimensions increases, fewer clusters form, indicating that a broader range of opinions leads to fewer, larger groups. This study provides insights into the feedback loop between agent movements and opinion polarisation, providing insights on the mechanisms behind social segregation and the formation of echo chambers. Furthermore, these findings are crucial for understanding and addressing societal issues such as political polarisation, misinformation spread, and the dynamics of social cohesion. Our research contributes to the field of opinion dynamics by highlighting the significant role of physical space and movement in shaping collective opinions and social structures, offering a comprehensive framework for future studies on the interplay between mobility, opinion formation, and polarisation.

Indexed as

Attraction-repulsion modelOpinion clustersOpinion dynamicsPolarisation

Identifiers

PMID42109309
PMCPMC13156234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.