Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109305›Full record

ReviewNational science review2026

Bridging data and discovery: a survey on knowledge graphs in AI for science.

Keyan Ding, Zhihui Zhu, Yuqi Tang, Kehua Feng, Xiang Zhuang, Hongwei Wang, Yi Yang, Huifang Du, Zhangkai Ni, Shiqi Wang and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Keyan DingCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Zhihui ZhuZJU-Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 311200, China.
Yuqi TangZJU-UIUC Institute, Zhejiang University, Haining 314400, China.
Kehua FengCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Xiang ZhuangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Hongwei WangZJU-UIUC Institute, Zhejiang University, Haining 314400, China.
Yi YangZJU-Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 311200, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1330-9985
Huifang DuCollege of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Zhangkai NiCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
Shiqi WangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Xiaohui FanCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-3007
Huabin XingCollege of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Lei BaiShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai 200232, China.
Qi LiuSchool of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Haofen WangCollege of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Qiang ZhangZJU-Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 311200, China.
Huajun ChenCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge graphs have emerged as a powerful paradigm for structuring, organizing and reasoning over complex scientific knowledge, and are increasingly recognized as catalysts for accelerating AI for science. This study provides a comprehensive survey of scientific knowledge graphs (SciKGs), covering their construction methodologies and diverse applications across biology, chemistry and materials science. We examine how SciKGs support tasks such as drug development, omics analysis, reaction prediction and materials design, and highlight how the synergistic integration of SciKGs and large language models (LLMs) forms a knowledge- and language-driven framework for scientific discovery, in which SciKGs serve as the foundational knowledge infrastructure and LLMs act as dynamic semantic engines. We further identify key challenges and outline emerging opportunities for building auditable, interoperable and self-evolving SciKGs. Looking forward, we envision a new generation of SciKG-centered ecosystems where self-updating graphs, co-evolving with LLMs and embodied within AI scientists, become core infrastructures that autonomously drive, verify and accelerate scientific discovery.

Indexed as

AI for scienceautonomous scientific discoveryknowledge-driven frameworkscientific knowledge graph

Identifiers

PMID42109305
PMCPMC13154823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.