ReviewNational science review2026
Bridging data and discovery: a survey on knowledge graphs in AI for science.
Review in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge graphs have emerged as a powerful paradigm for structuring, organizing and reasoning over complex scientific knowledge, and are increasingly recognized as catalysts for accelerating AI for science. This study provides a comprehensive survey of scientific knowledge graphs (SciKGs), covering their construction methodologies and diverse applications across biology, chemistry and materials science. We examine how SciKGs support tasks such as drug development, omics analysis, reaction prediction and materials design, and highlight how the synergistic integration of SciKGs and large language models (LLMs) forms a knowledge- and language-driven framework for scientific discovery, in which SciKGs serve as the foundational knowledge infrastructure and LLMs act as dynamic semantic engines. We further identify key challenges and outline emerging opportunities for building auditable, interoperable and self-evolving SciKGs. Looking forward, we envision a new generation of SciKG-centered ecosystems where self-updating graphs, co-evolving with LLMs and embodied within AI scientists, become core infrastructures that autonomously drive, verify and accelerate scientific discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.