ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Randomness as a behavioral marker of attentional control during the attention training technique and its neural correlates.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Attention Training Technique (ATT) is a core intervention of metacognitive therapy (MCT) effective in reducing repetitive negative thinking by engaging the lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC). The current study tests whether a parallel random number generation (RNG) task can serve as a behavioral marker of attentional engagement. Methods: We conducted two studies using the fMRI-adapted ATT paradigm combined with a parallel RNG task. In the behavioral study (N = 36), we compared two task versions with short (21 presses) versus long (45 presses) trials. In the fMRI study (N = 42), the ATT paradigm was performed with either parallel RNG or a motor control task. Markers of randomness (i.e., Redundancy, Repetition Gap, and Coupon scores) were compared between ATT conditions. Trait AC was measured using the Attentional Control Scale (ACS). Results: Randomness was reduced during ATT compared to control trials in both studies ( Conclusions: These findings establish RNG as a feasible and sensitive behavioral marker of ATT engagement and offer the opportunity to link behavioral performance during ATT to individual differences in AC. However, dual-task demands limit the use of RNG as a behavioral marker, particularly in fMRI which calls for alternative, behavior-independent measures of attentional effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.