ArticleThoracic cancer2026
The Efficacy and Safety of Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Anlotinib in Small-Cell Lung Cancer for Second-Line Therapy.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtensive Small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has a poor prognosis following the failure of first-line therapy based immune checkpoint inhibitors. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel combined with anlotinib as second-line treatment for relapsed SCLC.
methodsPatients were divided into two groups: patients receiving 125 mg/m
resultsBetween January 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024, 48 patients were enrolled into the study. The median PFS was 6.0 months in the ANNAB group and 4.7 months in the NAP group (p = 0.0004). ORR was significantly higher in the ANNAB group than in the NAP group (37.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.0363). The median OS was 10.0 months in the ANNAB group compared to 7.3 months in the NAP group (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in adverse events between the two groups.
conclusionsThe combination of nab-paclitaxel and anlotinib as second-line treatment for recurrent SCLC demonstrated promising efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile, suggesting its potential as a viable therapeutic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.