ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Genomic selection validated across two generations of loblolly pine breeding.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimising realised genetic gain with low forward predictive ability across cycles for cooking time and correlated traits in common bean based on multivariate genomic selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the effectiveness of genomic selection (GS) in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) using a 2-generation closed breeding population and a large, genetically diverse Mainline population. Single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) models were used to include all phenotypic, genotypic, and pedigree information. Prediction accuracies of genomic estimated breeding values reached up to 0.70 for stem volume and stem straightness. Prediction accuracy showed a strong linear relationship with mean relatedness between training and validation populations (r > 0.92). Scaling the genomic and pedigree relationship matrices improved model stability, increased prediction accuracy, and reduced bias in genomic estimated breeding values. Estimates of heritability and variance components from ssGBLUP were consistent with pedigree-based models, particularly when genomic relationships were properly scaled. Genomic selection had approximately 50% more genetic gain per year relative to conventional selection. Overall, these results demonstrate that GS can be effectively integrated into operational Pinus taeda breeding programs, given sustained investment in large, well-connected training populations with high-quality phenotypic data. We also outline the planned implementation of GS in the North Carolina State University Cooperative Tree Improvement Program to increase genetic gain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.