Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109143›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Genomic selection validated across two generations of loblolly pine breeding.

Fikret Isik, Mohammad Nasir Shalizi, Trevor D Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fikret IsikDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Cooperative Tree Improvement Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2833-7919
Mohammad Nasir ShaliziDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Cooperative Tree Improvement Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7773-741X
Trevor D WalkerDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Cooperative Tree Improvement Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7073-7898

Funding

NC State University Cooperative Tree Improvement ProgramNSF-NIFA Joint Plant-Biotic Interactions Program # 2022-67013-37717USDA-NIFA Plant Breeding Program # 2016-67013-24469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of genomic selection (GS) in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) using a 2-generation closed breeding population and a large, genetically diverse Mainline population. Single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) models were used to include all phenotypic, genotypic, and pedigree information. Prediction accuracies of genomic estimated breeding values reached up to 0.70 for stem volume and stem straightness. Prediction accuracy showed a strong linear relationship with mean relatedness between training and validation populations (r > 0.92). Scaling the genomic and pedigree relationship matrices improved model stability, increased prediction accuracy, and reduced bias in genomic estimated breeding values. Estimates of heritability and variance components from ssGBLUP were consistent with pedigree-based models, particularly when genomic relationships were properly scaled. Genomic selection had approximately 50% more genetic gain per year relative to conventional selection. Overall, these results demonstrate that GS can be effectively integrated into operational Pinus taeda breeding programs, given sustained investment in large, well-connected training populations with high-quality phenotypic data. We also outline the planned implementation of GS in the North Carolina State University Cooperative Tree Improvement Program to increase genetic gain.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomicsPinus taedaPlant BreedingSelection, GeneticBreedingGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypeABLUPgenetic gaingenomic predictionGenPedPinus taedaprediction accuracyrelatednessshared data resourcessGBLUPtree breeding

Identifiers

PMID42109143
PMCPMC13334174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.