ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2026
Assessment of air handling unit to improve ventilation in congregate living settings: a multicenter cross-sectional study.
Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems can modulate the risk of respiratory virus transmission. In congregate living settings (CLS), variability in the quality of this infrastructure presents an improvement opportunity.
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study of the air handling units (AHU) of HVAC systems across a network of CLS to identify the most common problems and specific opportunities to improve ventilation. A third-party expert performed systematic HVAC assessments, which were analyzed based on presence and function of key AHU components to determine their association with air changes per hour (ACH) using a multivariable linear regression model.
resultsAcross 15 participating CLS, the median ACH was 3.3 (IQR = 10.4) in common areas, 3.5 (IQR = 12.6) in resident rooms, and 6.6 (IQR = 9.7) in resident bathrooms. Closed outside air dampers and fans turned off was associated with decreased ACH in resident rooms (-9.5 ACH, 95% CI, -0.2 to -18.9) and resident washrooms (-7.0 ACH, 95% CI, -1.3 to -12.7). The absence of ducted air source was associated with decreased ACH in resident rooms (-12.2 ACH, 95% CI, -1.0 to -23.5).
conclusionsAcross 15 CLS, we identified readily actionable targets for improvements to ventilation. Based on our findings, we propose assessment criteria to optimize the performance of existing AHU. Prospective studies evaluating the impact of a standardized approach to improving AHU on safety of CLS residents are needed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.