Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42109039›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2026

Delaying rewards reduces egoism bias during prosocial acts.

Guanglong Liu, Wendeng Yang, Ya Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guanglong LiuDepartment of Psychology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Wendeng YangDepartment of Psychology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Ya ZhengDepartment of Psychology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7469-5955

Funding

2024 Tertiary Education Scientific Research Project of Guangzhou Municipal Education Bureau 2024312195National Natural Science Foundation of China 32571255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People tend to prioritize their own benefits over those of others during reward evaluation, a tendency known as egoism bias. Recent evidence suggests that delaying rewards may reduce this bias in prosocial behavior, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study investigated this issue by recording EEG activity when participants (N = 40) evaluated immediate or delayed rewards for themselves and an anonymous person during a prosocial reward task. We found an egoism bias in immediate reward evaluation, with stronger preferences and neural reward sensitivity (as indexed by the reward positivity, P3, and delta power) for self-benefiting compared to other-benefiting trials. Crucially, this egoism bias decreases when rewards were delayed, as shown by comparable reward sensitivity, overlapping neural representations, and positive neural correlations between self-benefiting and other-benefiting trials. These convergent findings establish reward deferral as a critical variable in reducing egoism bias during prosocial decision-making.

Indexed as

BrainDelay DiscountingRewardSocial BehaviorAdultBiasDecision MakingEgoElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorsYoung Adultdelay discountingEEGegoism biasprosocial behaviorreward evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42109039
PMCPMC13221249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.