Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42108961›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Intervention Effects on Phonological Processing in Children With Developmental Speech and/or Language Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies With Group Design.

Marja Laasonen, Susana Sanduvete-Chaves, Salvador Chacón-Moscoso, Dina Caetano Alves, Martina Ozbič, Kakia Petinou, Anna-Kaisa Tolonen, Krisztina Zajdó, Pauline Frizelle, Carol-Anne Murphy and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marja LaasonenDepartment of Logopedics, School of Humanities, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4628-4251
Susana Sanduvete-ChavesDepartamento de Psicología Experimental, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Salvador Chacón-MoscosoDepartamento de Psicología Experimental, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Dina Caetano AlvesSchool of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal.
Martina OzbičDepartment of Educational Studies, University of Primorska, Faculty of Education, Koper-Capodistria and LOGOS, private clinical practice, Sežana, Slovenia.
Kakia PetinouDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6580-5190
Anna-Kaisa TolonenDepartment of Logopedics, School of Humanities, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.
Krisztina ZajdóDepartment of Special Education/Speech-Language Therapy, Széchenyi István University/The University of Győr, Győr, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6047-2275
Pauline FrizelleDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9715-3788
Carol-Anne MurphySchool of Allied Health and Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9356-4045
David SaldañaDepartamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4192-7924
Sari KunnariResearch Unit of Logopedics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

European Cooperation in Science and Technology GrantCOST106/14FCT, Foundation for Science and Technology UIDB/00214/2020Government of ChileGovernment of SpainMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2020-115486GB-I00National Scientific and Technological Development Fund 1250316research project ANID
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChallenges in phonological processing are prevalent in children with developmental speech and/or language disorders and are associated with their language acquisition and later reading skills. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis from the same project of studies with a group design on the effects of interventions on output phonology, found that oral language interventions have a positive effect on output phonology, specifically speech production accuracy. These interventions are expected to impact the phonological representational level as well and, thus, also affect phonological processing skills in this population. However, no prior systematic reviews or meta-analyses have been conducted on this topic.

aimsWe conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of oral language interventions on children and adolescents with developmental speech and/or language disorders, focusing on phonological processing as the primary outcome measure, including phonological awareness, phonological retrieval efficiency, and short-term memory. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The systematic review was pre-registered (PROSPERO ID: CRD42017076075) and followed the PRISMA guidelines. A search for oral language interventions in children and adolescents with developmental speech and/or language disorders (mean age, 3-18 years) was conducted across seven databases (PubMed, Web of Science, ERIC, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Scopus, LLBA) for studies published between January 2006 and May 2023. We included studies with a group design and phonological processing as the outcome measure. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for study appraisal. Individual and average standardised mean differences g were used in the meta-analysis. We also explored the influence of various moderators. OUTCOMES AND

resultsWe identified 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the risk of bias was low to moderate. Significant and large effect sizes were found in pre-post studies with control groups, showing improvements post-intervention in phonological awareness, g = 0.710, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.504, 0.917], and phonological short-term memory, g = 0.785, p = 0.010, 95% CI [0.192, 1.279]. Some moderator variables emerged, for example, larger effects when the interventions were based on an integrated theoretical approach, applied in small groups, or when they had processing targets. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The results demonstrate that oral language interventions can effectively improve specific phonological processing skills in children and adolescents with developmental speech and/or language disorders. The identification of key moderating factors provides valuable guidance for clinical practice. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Children with developmental speech and/or language disorders often have difficulties in phonological processing that can hamper their reading development. Interventions are effective for speech production, but there are no previous systematic reviews or meta-analyses on their effects on the phonological processing skills of children and adolescents with developmental speech and/or language disorders. What this paper adds to existing knowledge We present empirical evidence of the effectiveness of oral language interventions in improving phonological processing (including phonological awareness and phonological short-term memory) in children and adolescents with developmental speech and/or language disorders. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Oral language interventions have a positive effect on the phonological processing skills of children and adolescents with developmental speech and/or language disorders. They may serve as an indirect means of support for their reading development.

Indexed as

Language Development DisordersLanguage TherapyPhoneticsSpeech DisordersSpeech TherapyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansMemory, Short-TermTreatment Outcomeinterventionlanguage disordermeta‐analysisphonological processingspeech disordersystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42108961
PMCPMC13158719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.