ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2026
Health Outcomes Led by Advanced Practice Nurses in Patients With Chronic Wounds: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo examine and map the available literature on outcomes associated with interventions carried out by advanced practice nurses in chronic wound care.
backgroundThe role of the advanced practice nurses in wound care is identified as a key element in the management of patients with chronic wounds. However, the literature offers fragmented knowledge of the outcomes associated with their practice.
designScoping review.
methodsThis scoping review was conducted following the methodological framework proposed by Arskey and O'Malley, following the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for Scoping Review. PRISMA-ScR Checklist is included in the manuscript. Observational or experimental studies related to patients affected by chronic wounds and cared for by advanced practice nurses in wound care were included. DATA SOURCES: The following databases were queried: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from 01 May 2025 to 31 October 2025.
resultsThe search strategy in the consulted databases identified 1956 studies; 31 met the inclusion criteria. Different types of chronic wounds were investigated: diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, and pressure injuries. The most frequently measured outcomes were clinical responses (healing, recurrence, complications), organizational efficiency (referrals, resource utilization), and patient-reported outcomes.
conclusionEvidence from the included studies suggests that Advanced practice nurses led wound care models may be associated with faster healing, lower recurrence and complication rates, and more efficient care pathways, across different settings. This review highlights the global applicability of APN-led models, showing consistent improvements in clinical, organizational, and patient-reported outcomes through core interventions. REPORTING
methodThis scoping review follows Arskey and O'Malley's methodological framework and the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for Scoping Review. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The revision protocol was registered on the OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P9TA4).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.