Observational studyAmerican journal of hematology2026
Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Glofitamab-Based Salvage Therapy in Chinese Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas.
Observational study in American journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Treatment Landscape and Advances in Lymphoma in China: A Special Issue.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glofitamab, a CD20 × CD3 bispecific antibody, has demonstrated significant efficacy in relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphomas. However, real-world evidence on its clinical performance and immunologic correlates, particularly in the context of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, remains limited. This observational study included 64 patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma who received glofitamab-based therapy between February 2024 and December 2025 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate, whereas secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. We also analyzed the impact of prior bispecific antibody (BsAb) exposure on CAR-T cell manufacturing and efficacy and assessed the relationship between peripheral T-cell subsets and treatment outcomes. Among 56 evaluable patients, the CR and ORR were 41.1% and 78.7%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were not reached, with estimated 1-year PFS and OS rates of 61.3% and 67.7%. Patients with non-germinal center B-cell (non-GCB) subtype had significantly higher PFS than those with GCB subtype (p = 0.029), whereas prior CAR-T therapy was associated with poorer PFS (p = 0.022). Prior BsAb exposure did not affect CAR-T manufacture or efficacy. Immunophenotyping revealed that patients achieving CR had higher baseline CD4
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.