Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42108745›Full record

ArticleBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2026

Environmental Aspects in Price and Reimbursement Decisions of Medicines-A Scoping Review.

Lasse Alajärvi, Mirella Miettinen, Johanna Timonen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lasse AlajärviSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6071-3297
Mirella MiettinenLaw School, Faculty of Social Sciences and Business Studies, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3593-3938
Johanna TimonenSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

Kela
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental impacts of medicines are increasingly recognised but rarely embedded in their pricing and reimbursement (P&R) and related assessments. This scoping review mapped how environmental aspects, including antimicrobial resistance (AMR) stewardship, are or could be considered in P&R of medicines and identified challenges for their implementation. Electronic searches from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Edilex, HeinOnline, Westlaw, Google Scholar and official agencies' websites were conducted. Eligible items covered developed country settings and described existing or proposed integration of environmental aspects into medicine pricing or reimbursement. Of 4476 publications, 21 were included. The publications were from 2013 to 2023, most of them addressing ecotoxicological and climate impacts. Six types of means to embed environmental aspects into P&R were identified: health technology assessment (HTA) integration, reimbursement criteria, pricing criteria, environmental classification, regulation and delinkage models. Most proposals were conceptual, whereas implemented or piloted examples focused on AMR-oriented means. Reported challenges for implementation included challenges regarding data availability, comparability and verification; valuation and methodological integration; incentive design and cost distribution; and equity and political feasibility. Environmental aspects are not yet routine in medicine P&R assessments due to a lack of standardised, verifiable product-level data, appraisal methods and equity-sensitive policy design.

Indexed as

Drug CostsEnvironmentReimbursement MechanismsCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansTechnology Assessment, Biomedicalenvironmentmedicinepolicypricereimbursement

Identifiers

PMID42108745
PMCPMC13158648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.