Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42108630›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

SE(3)-PROTACs: Geometric deep learning for PROTAC degradation prediction.

Akash Reddy Kothakapu, Sharanya Madugula, Saketh Bharadwaj Sharma Gandeed, Kavya Sri Sai Yadlapati, Sharanya Sury, Vani Kondaparthi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Akash Reddy KothakapuDepartment of Computer Science Engineering, Keshav Memorial College of Engineering, Ibrahimpatnam, Hyderabad, Telangana 501510, India.
Sharanya MadugulaDepartment of Computer Science Engineering (IoT), Keshav Memorial College of Engineering, Ibrahimpatnam, Hyderabad, Telangana 501510, India.
Saketh Bharadwaj Sharma GandeedDepartment of Computer Science Engineering, Keshav Memorial College of Engineering, Ibrahimpatnam, Hyderabad, Telangana 501510, India.
Kavya Sri Sai YadlapatiDrugparadigm Research Laboratory, Uppal, Hyderabad, Telangana 500039, India.
Sharanya SuryDrugparadigm Research Laboratory, Uppal, Hyderabad, Telangana 500039, India.
Vani KondaparthiDepartment of Chemistry, Keshav Memorial Engineering College, Uppal, Hyderabad, Telangana 500088, India.ORCID 0009-0007-0991-5003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are a valuable therapeutic method for degrading target proteins of interest. Their success depends on forming a stable ternary complex composed of PROTAC, the target protein, and the E3 ligase-a relationship that is inherently difficult to predict. Existing deep learning methods often fail to accurately model the 3D arrangement of this ternary structure or overlook the critical background information provided by sequences, which is essential for accurate degradation predictions. Herein, we introduce SE(3)-PROTACs, a PROTAC degradation prediction model designed specifically using a geometric deep learning architecture. An SE(3)-equivariant transformer encodes PROTAC substructures-the warhead, linker, and E3 ligand-as molecular graphs invariant to translation and rotation while retaining geometrical features relevant to chemistry. Pretrained evolutionary scale modeling (ESM) embeddings provide functional and structural context to target proteins and E3 ligases directly from sequences, thus bypassing the limitations inherent in incomplete structural data. A Pairwise Interaction Mechanism computes all-pairs compatibility scores between target and E3 ligase residue positions conditioned on the PROTAC scaffold, using mean-pooled sigmoid weighting to reweight each protein representation before classification. A benchmark dataset of 1979 curated PROTAC samples sourced from PROTAC-DB was used for model development and evaluation. SE(3)-PROTACs achieved a test accuracy of 80.81% on a held-out random-split test set, with consistent performance across the cluster-split (65.62%) and temporal-split (64.08%) evaluations. SE(3)-PROTACs outperform baseline models across random, cluster-based, and temporal evaluations, demonstrating strong generalization to new targets and compounds, and serving as a reliable computational pre-filter for prioritizing candidate degraders before experimental validation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProteinsProteolysisProteolysis Targeting ChimeraHumansModels, MolecularUbiquitin-Protein LigasesProteinsProteolysis Targeting ChimeraUbiquitin-Protein Ligasesevolutionary scale modelinggeometric deep learningpairwise interaction mechanismprotein language modelproteolysis-targeting chimeraspecial Euclidean group 3 transformertargeted protein degradation

Identifiers

PMID42108630
PMCPMC13158127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.