ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2026
Association between palliative care consultation and care transition outcomes among hospitalized advanced cancer patients.
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe period after hospital discharge is a high-risk phase for patients with advanced cancer, often involving acute-care use that reflects transitional care quality. The impact of inpatient palliative care (PC) consultation on short-term post-discharge outcomes, however, remains uncertain. We assessed whether inpatient PC consultation was associated with differences in 30-day post-discharge outcomes.
methodsUsing electronic medical records from a tertiary hospital linked with national claims data, we identified patients with lung, stomach, colorectal, liver, or pancreatobiliary cancer who died between 2018 and 2023. Those discharged alive after a hospitalization with inpatient PC consultation were matched 1:1 to patients without PC using propensity scores. Outcomes were 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, hospital readmissions, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, 30-day mortality, and total direct medical costs. Fine-Gray competing risk and generalized linear models were used for comparisons.
resultsAmong 830 matched individuals, 30-day ED visits (45.8% vs 45.5%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.72 to 1.27) and readmission rates (69.6% vs 72.3%; aOR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.63 to 1.18) were similar. Intensive care unit admission rates were substantially lower among patients receiving PC (1.9% vs 9.2%; aOR = 0.17; 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.37). The total 30-day medical costs were lower in the PC group (cost ratio = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.76). Thirty-day mortality was higher among patients who required PC (37.6% vs 16.1%).
conclusionInpatient PC consultation was not associated with 30-day ED visits or hospital readmissions but was linked to substantially lower ICU admissions and reduced short-term medical costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.